HomeContributorsFundamental AnalysisUS: Better Than Expected Trade Deficit in February

US: Better Than Expected Trade Deficit in February

A large $4.3 billion decrease in the imports of goods, coupled with a small $0.4 billion increase in exports, were the reasons for the narrowing of the deficit in February.

Lower Automotive and Consumer Goods Imports Helped Trade

A large drop in the importation of automotive and consumer goods products was the culprit of the decline in imports of goods in February. Automotive imports declined $2.6 billion and consumer goods imports dropped $3.1 billion after an increase of $0.9 billion and $2.4 billion in January, respectively. Overall, imports of goods and services declined 1.8 percent in February after an increase of 2.3 percent in January. But what is more important for U.S. GDP growth during the first quarter of the year is that real imports of goods declined by a larger 2.6 percent during the month after increasing 2.0 percent in January.

Meanwhile, exports of goods and services increased 0.2 percent during the second month of the year after increasing 0.8 percent in January. In real terms, exports of goods increased 0.3 percent after increasing 0.4 percent in January.

February Deficit Consistent with Weak Q1 Consumer Demand

The improvement in the February trade deficit is consistent with the softness we have seen in U.S. consumer demand. Furthermore, yesterday’s release of a very weak Wards automobile sales report for March could put further downward pressure on the deficit if this weakness extends into the third month of the quarter.

Lower imports of automotive and consumer goods in February helped to bring down the trade deficit in February. They also help in improving the prospects of a lessened negative effect from the trade deficit on real GDP growth during the first quarter of the year. However, the lower deficit cannot hide the fact that U.S. consumer demand has remained very weak during the first two months of 2017 after a very strong performance by the consumer during the last quarter of 2016.

Strong Decline in the Trade Deficit Versus Asia and Europe

Another salient characteristic of February’s trade deficit was a large drop in the trade deficit with the Pacific Rim countries, specifically with China, and a smaller decline in the deficit versus Europe. The trade deficit with the Pacific Rim countries declined to $26.8 billion in February from $38.6 billion in January. The bulk of the decline came from China, with the deficit coming down to $23 billion in February from $31.3 billion in January.

Meanwhile, the trade deficit with Europe declined from $13.9 billion in January to $10.7 billion in February. At the same time, the deficit with Mexico increased from $3.9 billion in January to $5.8 billion in February while the deficit with Canada declined from $3.4 billion in January to $2.1 billion in February.

Wells Fargo Securities
Wells Fargo Securitieshttp://www.wellsfargo.com/
Wells Fargo Securities Economics Group publications are produced by Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, a U.S broker-dealer registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, and the Securities Investor Protection Corp. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, distributes these publications directly and through subsidiaries including, but not limited to, Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank N.A, Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, and Wells Fargo Securities International Limited. The information and opinions herein are for general information use only. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC does not guarantee their accuracy or completeness, nor does Wells Fargo Securities, LLC assume any liability for any loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions. Such information and opinions are subject to change without notice, are for general information only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sales of any security or as personalized investment advice. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC is a separate legal entity and distinct from affiliated banks and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company © 2010 Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.

Featured Analysis

Learn Forex Trading