RBA Monetary Policy Board lifts cash rate to 4.6%, November follow-up now the base case. Middle East conflict a more prominent factor than at previous meeting.
- As was universally expected, the RBA Monetary Policy Board (MPB) lifted the cash rate by 25bps to 4.6% at its September 2026.
- This is quite the turnaround from the 11 August meeting, where an extended period on hold looked to be the base case. At that time, the data had broken against the RBA’s more hawkish view, and its published forecasts did not support further hikes. But the MPB can now point to the emergence of some of the upside risks to inflation it warned of in August.
- The post-meeting statement was notable for its emphasis on the Middle East conflict, noting that “global energy prices are now much higher than had been assumed in the August forecasts” – “much higher” is stronger language than one normally sees in an RBA statement. The RBA’s liaison indicates that firms are passing this on or planning to do so. The pass-through was characterised as partial, and additional to domestically driven inflation arising from capacity pressures. We read this as implying that the RBA is concerned about upside risks to underlying inflation in Q4 of this year, as well as Q3.
- The RBA is also wary about pressure on both construction costs and retail prices of IT goods arising from the AI/data centre boom, although in the media conference, the Governor clarified that risks there were building rather than materialising. The broader background highlighted in the Governor’s opening statement to the media conference, is of demand outstripping supply. The statement evidenced this by noting the stronger July CPI and June quarter GDP results than expected.
- The accompanying statement was notable for the absence of language about the labour market being a little tight, despite this being the inter-meeting message from the Governor and other staff (see, for example, the Governor’s opening statement on 18 September) and the language in the post-meeting media conference. Views clearly differ on this: we note that the Treasury forecasts underlying the May budget and the recent Intergenerational Review imply both more spare capacity in the labour market (a lower NAIRU) and faster growth in potential from wherever the starting point is (higher productivity growth and trend increase in participation). Instead, the post-meeting statement characterised the labour market as easing “broadly as expected”, despite the unemployment rate already rising higher than the August SMP forecast of 4.5% for the December quarter.
- The decision was unanimous, suggesting that any qualms external MPB members might have had about the RBA’s downbeat view of supply capacity were overruled by resurgent oil prices and the stronger than forecast CPI and GDP data.
- With upside risks being seen to have emerged, the post-meeting statement language included that the Board “will continue to do what it considers necessary to bring inflation sustainably back to target, including increasing the cash rate target further if needed”, a small but meaningful change from the “if upside risks materialise” language from the previous meeting, and back to the tone of the language at the June meeting.
- The bar for a follow-up hike in November is low. Indeed, judging by today’s rhetoric, a November hike is now the base case, absent a lasting resolution of the Middle East conflict beforehand, or some other event that significantly lowers the outlook for energy-related costs in Australia. The bar for hikes beyond that is much higher, given the cumulative rise in interest rates, and noting that the labour market is easing and the housing market will likely weaken further.
