Sample Category Title

BoE opted to keep the Bank Rate unchanged at 5.00%, as expected, with an 8-1 vote. Swati Dhingra, a known dove, was the only member voting for a 25bps rate cut. Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden, who has consistently supported cuts since May, chose not to vote for a reduction this time.

In its statement, BoE noted that UK economic indicators have shown "limited news" relative to expectations outlined in the August MPR. Inflation stood at 2.2% in August and is anticipated to rise to around 2.5% by year-end as the effects of last year’s energy price declines drop out of the annual comparison. Services inflation remains notably elevated at 5.6%, while private sector wage growth slowed to 4.9% in the three months to July.

BoE emphasized that "absence of material developments", it will continue to follow a "gradual approach" to unwinding policy restrictions. Monetary policy is expected to stay restrictive for a sufficiently long period until inflation risks subside, ensuring it returns to the 2% target. The central bank reaffirmed its commitment to closely monitor inflation persistence and determine the necessary level of restrictiveness "at each meeting."

Full BoE statement here.

Monetary Policy Summary, September 2024

The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) sets monetary policy to meet the 2% inflation target, and in a way that helps to sustain growth and employment. The MPC adopts a medium-term and forward-looking approach to determine the monetary stance required to achieve the inflation target sustainably.

At its meeting ending on 18 September 2024, the MPC voted by a majority of 8–1 to maintain Bank Rate at 5%. One member preferred to reduce Bank Rate by 0.25 percentage points, to 4.75%. The Committee voted unanimously to reduce the stock of UK government bond purchases held for monetary policy purposes, and financed by the issuance of central bank reserves, by £100 billion over the next 12 months, to a total of £558 billion.

Monetary policy decisions have been guided by the need to squeeze persistent inflationary pressures out of the system so as to return CPI inflation to the 2% target both in a timely manner and on a lasting basis. Policy has been acting to ensure that inflation expectations remain well anchored. As set out at the time of the August Monetary Policy Report, the Committee’s deliberations have been supported by the consideration of a range of cases, to which different probabilities and different risks can be attached.

In the first case, the unwinding of the global shocks that drove up inflation and the resulting fall in headline inflation should continue to feed through to weaker pay and price-setting dynamics. The persistence of inflationary pressures would therefore dissipate with a less restrictive stance of monetary policy than in other cases.

In the second case, a period of economic slack, in which GDP falls below potential and the labour market eases further, may be required in order for pay and price-setting dynamics to normalise fully. Domestic inflationary persistence would then be expected to fade away, owing to the opening up of slack from a more restrictive stance of monetary policy relative to the first case.

In the third case, the economy may be subject to structural shifts such as changes in wage and price-setting following the major supply shocks experienced over recent years. The degree of restrictiveness of monetary policy may be less than embodied in the Committee’s latest assessment, meaning that monetary policy would have to remain tighter for longer.

Since the MPC’s previous meeting, global activity growth has continued at a steady pace, although some data outturns suggest greater uncertainty around the near-term outlook. Oil prices have fallen back, reflecting in large part weaker demand. Market-implied paths for policy rates across major advanced economies have declined.

There has generally been limited news in UK economic indicators relative to the Committee’s expectations in the August Monetary Policy Report. Headline GDP growth is expected to return to its underlying pace of around 0.3% per quarter in the second half of the year. Twelve-month CPI inflation was 2.2% in August, and is expected to increase to around 2½% towards the end of this year as declines in energy prices last year fall out of the annual comparison. Services consumer price inflation remained elevated at 5.6% in August. Private sector regular average weekly earnings growth declined to 4.9% in the three months to July.

At this meeting, the Committee voted to maintain Bank Rate at 5%.

In the absence of material developments, a gradual approach to removing policy restraint remains appropriate. Monetary policy will need to continue to remain restrictive for sufficiently long until the risks to inflation returning sustainably to the 2% target in the medium term have dissipated further. The Committee continues to monitor closely the risks of inflation persistence and will decide the appropriate degree of monetary policy restrictiveness at each meeting.

Minutes of the Monetary Policy Committee meeting ending on 18 September 2024

1: Before turning to its immediate policy decisions, the Committee discussed: the international economy; monetary and financial conditions; demand and output; and supply, costs and prices.

The international economy

1: UK-weighted global GDP was estimated to have grown by 0.5% in 2024 Q2, broadly in line with the projection in the August Monetary Policy Report, and consistent with steady growth over recent quarters. US GDP had grown more strongly than had been anticipated, while GDP growth had moderated in the euro area and in China in the second quarter.

2: In the third quarter, euro-area GDP growth was expected to be a little weaker than had been anticipated in the August Report, and US GDP growth was expected to moderate somewhat, in line with previous expectations. Activity indicators such as PMIs suggested ongoing weakness in the manufacturing sector in both economies over recent months, while the services sector had continued to expand.

3: Labour market outturns in the United States had been softer in July and August relative to previous months. Unemployment in the euro area had remained low, pointing to some continuing tightness. Wage growth had continued to moderate across both regions.

4: Headline consumer price inflation had declined further towards central bank targets in the euro area and in the United States. In the euro area, 12-month HICP inflation had been 2.2% in August, while core inflation had ticked down to 2.8%, in line with market participants’ expectations. US CPI inflation had fallen to 2.5% in August, while core CPI inflation had remained unchanged at 3.2%, also in line with market expectations. Annual services price inflation had remained elevated in both economies, although higher frequency measures pointed to some easing over recent months.

5: There were tentative signs of a shift in the balance of risks to global activity towards the downside. Consistent with that, since the MPC's previous meeting, the Brent spot oil price had declined by around 6%, to $75 per barrel. Market contacts had ascribed the moves largely to weaker demand in China, as indicators of domestic demand there had continued to be soft.

Monetary and financial conditions

6: Since the MPC’s previous meeting, government bond yields had fallen across major advanced economies in response to the softening in US labour market data and associated FOMC communications. Market-implied paths for policy rates across economies had generally ended the period lower. Coupled with UK data releases in that period having been largely in line with market expectations, that meant UK interest rate movements had been driven primarily by developments in the United States. Nevertheless, the UK market-implied path had fallen by less than in the United States. That had been associated with an appreciation of sterling against the dollar of 3%, which had accounted for most of the 1% increase in the sterling effective exchange rate since the previous MPC meeting.

7: Movements in yields across major advanced economies had been particularly pronounced early in August, alongside large moves in asset prices more generally. Market-specific factors including seasonally low market liquidity were likely to have exacerbated reactions to news. While these early August moves had unwound quickly, yields across countries had nevertheless ended the period lower. In contrast, UK equity prices had been little changed since the MPC’s previous meeting and the S&P 500 and Euro Stoxx 50 had both increased somewhat.

8: At its meeting on 12 September, the ECB Governing Council had reduced its key policy rate by 25 basis points, in line with market expectations. In its statement, the Governing Council had reiterated its data-dependent and meeting-by-meeting approach, focused on the inflation outlook and strength of policy transmission. At its meeting ending on 18 September, the FOMC was expected to reduce the federal funds rate by either 25 or 50 basis points.

9: In the United Kingdom, Bank Rate expectations implied by market pricing had continued to suggest that the next 25 basis point cut would occur in November. That was consistent with the Bank’s latest Market Participants Survey (MaPS). Beyond November, while the median MaPS profile implied a slightly slower pace of reduction in Bank Rate than the market-implied path, both pointed to much more gradual reductions than were expected in the United States and to a lesser extent in the euro area.

10: Regarding credit conditions, it was too soon to assess fully the extent to which the Bank Rate reduction in August had passed through to the relevant saving and borrowing rates facing households and corporates. Nevertheless, as had been anticipated, mortgage rates had fallen since the MPC’s previous meeting broadly in line with declines in risk-free reference rates.

11: The share of two-year fixed-rate mortgages within new secured household lending had been increasing since 2023 Q1, despite rates on these mortgages being above five-year fixed rates over this period. That had reversed the previous trend whereby longer-duration mortgage fixes had increased in popularity since 2016, probably reflecting household expectations of lower interest rates. Slow mortgage stock turnover meant that the share of five-year fixed-rate mortgages in outstanding lending had remained historically high.

12: Household saving preferences had also adjusted over the past year, as rates offered on time deposits had become relatively less attractive, reflecting the declines in risk-free reference rates. Deposit flows had shifted into sight deposits and ISAs, many of which were instant access. Household deposits had continued to be the main driver of aggregate sterling broad money growth. The latter had increased to 1.6% on an annual basis in July, but had remained weak by historical standards.

Demand and output

13: UK GDP had increased by 0.6% in 2024 Q2, 0.1 percentage points lower than had been expected in the August Monetary Policy Report. That had followed 0.7% growth in Q1, but Bank staff judged that the underlying pace of growth had been somewhat weaker during the first half of the year.

14: Within the expenditure components of Q2 GDP, household consumption had risen by 0.2% on the quarter, while business and housing investment had both declined by 0.1%. Real government expenditure had increased by 1.6%, and there had continued to be some evidence of greater-than-projected central government spending in recent public sector finances data.

15: GDP had been unchanged on the month in both July and June but had grown by 0.5% on a three-month-on-three-month basis in July. Slightly weaker-than-expected output in July had been concentrated in the manufacturing and professional services sectors.

16: Bank staff now expected GDP growth of 0.3% in 2024 Q3, marginally weaker than the 0.4% rate that had been incorporated in the August Report. That was broadly in line with estimates of the underlying growth rate that had been extracted from models based on a range of business survey indicators and on disaggregated GDP data. The latest intelligence from the Bank’s Agents suggested that improving real incomes, the August Bank Rate reduction and anticipated further cuts in interest rates had underpinned improved sentiment and expectations of increased activity across most sectors around the turn of the year.

17: There had been little news from most indicators of consumer spending, although housing market data had strengthened somewhat. Retail sales volumes had been volatile, around a very gradually rising trend since the start of the year. GfK consumer confidence had been unchanged in August. Forward-looking indicators in the housing market had continued to point to a recovery in home buyer enquiries and prices, while mortgage approvals for house purchase had increased to their highest level since September 2022.

18: The Committee discussed the near-term outlook for activity and the evolution of the output gap. Although uncertainties surrounded this assessment, overall demand and supply were judged to have been broadly in balance over recent quarters. A continuation of the current pace of underlying GDP growth would, given the Committee’s view of potential supply growth, be consistent with little change in the output gap through the end of this year. That path was a little stronger than the August Report projections, however, in which demand growth had been expected to slow at the end of this year and a significant margin of spare capacity had been projected to open up over time. That projection in part reflected the previously announced medium-term tightening in the stance of fiscal policy, prior to the upcoming Budget. The Committee would also continue to monitor closely how the different channels of the monetary transmission mechanism were interacting with the dynamics of the household saving ratio, and in turn the outlook for consumer demand.

Supply, costs and prices

19: Labour market data quality issues continued to be an area of concern. Very low achieved sample sizes meant Labour Force Survey (LFS)-based estimates of labour market dynamics remained subject to considerable uncertainties. This was making it difficult to gauge the underlying state of labour market activity. The MPC had, for some time, utilised a wide range of data to inform its judgements on the labour market, including official data, business surveys and intelligence from the Bank’s Agents.

20: A Bank staff indicator model of underlying employment continued to point to growth of around 0.2% per quarter, broadly in line with population growth. There was greater dispersion among outturns from individual employment indicators. The KPMG/REC/S&P Global UK Report on Jobs had continued to point to a contraction in employment while the Lloyds Business Barometer suggested an expansion.

21: In line with softening labour demand, vacancies had continued to fall back gradually, although at a slower pace than in 2023 and they had remained above pre-pandemic levels. The REC Report and Agents’ intelligence signalled a continued easing in recruitment difficulties, with the latter suggesting improved job retention in some sectors. The vacancies-to-unemployment ratio had returned to its pre-pandemic average at the start of 2024 Q2. A Bank staff indicator model suggested that underlying unemployment had increased steadily over the past few quarters, in contrast to more volatile LFS data.

22: Indicators of households’ inflation expectations had largely normalised to close to their historical averages. The Bank of England/Ipsos Inflation Attitudes Survey’s measure of median short-term inflation expectations had fallen to 2.7% in August. The corresponding measure of medium-term expectations had remained close to, but below, its historical average. The Citi/YouGov indicator of households’ short-term inflation expectations had increased slightly to 3.1% in August from 2.7% previously, possibly owing to media reports of a rise in the Ofgem utility price cap in October. Businesses’ own price expectations, as reported in the DMP Survey, had remained at slightly more elevated levels, although on a continued downward path.

23: This normalisation in inflation expectations, as well as, to a lesser extent, the easing in labour market tightness, had supported continued moderation in pay growth. Annual private sector regular average weekly earnings growth had eased to 4.9% in the three months to July from 5.3% in the three months to June, broadly in line with August Monetary Policy Report projections. Other surveys suggested that wage growth would continue to moderate, although remain above inflation target-consistent levels, with the DMP Survey indicating a fall to approximately 4% over the next year. The latest Agents’ intelligence indicated that pay settlements over the second half of the year were, as expected, coming in at lower rates compared to H1, and 2025-expected settlements might be in a 2 to 4% range. There remained the possibility of some upside risk to pay growth depending on the trajectory of the National Living Wage (NLW) in the first half of next year.

24: Twelve-month CPI inflation had been 2.2% in August and July, slightly lower than August Report expectations. Consumer core goods and food price inflation had remained subdued as the cost pressures from previous global shocks had unwound further, and producer price levels had been broadly flat. Energy prices had continued to drag on CPI inflation.

25: Services price inflation had increased to 5.6% in August compared to 5.2% in July and 5.7% in June. This was slightly lower in August than had been expected at the time of the August Report. There had been volatility in a number of services sub-components in the July and August outturns, including accommodation and catering prices and airfares.

26: The Committee discussed momentum in services price inflation and price-setting behaviour in firms. Strength in services price inflation was supported by evidence from the DMP Survey which showed firms’ own-price inflation continuing to fall, but to a lesser extent among services firms. July CPI microdata pointed to a higher proportion of services prices being raised each month than was the case pre-Covid, though with some easing in catering services where food input costs had moderated. The monthly annualised inflation rates of a seasonally adjusted services price measure, which excluded indexed and volatile components, rents and foreign holidays, had averaged around 4% in the three months to August, close to its average since the end of 2023. Although it had fallen from its peak level, the apparent stability in this measure suggested further pass-through from lower labour costs and easing inflation expectations was still to come. Accordingly, Bank staff expected services inflation to ease slightly further in Q4.

27: CPI inflation was expected to increase somewhat over the remainder of this year, owing to the smaller drag on 12-month inflation from domestic energy bills. The announced uptick in utility prices to take effect in October was likely to be offset somewhat by the recent decrease in petrol prices.

The immediate policy decisions

28: The Monetary Policy Committee sets monetary policy to meet the 2% inflation target, and in a way that helps to sustain growth and employment. The MPC adopts a medium-term and forward-looking approach to determine the monetary stance required to achieve the inflation target sustainably.

29: Monetary policy decisions had been guided by the need to squeeze persistent inflationary pressures out of the system so as to return CPI inflation to the 2% target both in a timely manner and on a lasting basis. Policy had been acting to ensure that inflation expectations remained well anchored. As set out at the time of the August Monetary Policy Report, the Committee’s deliberations had been supported by the consideration of a range of cases, to which different probabilities and different risks could be attached.

30: In the first case, the unwinding of the global shocks that had driven up inflation and the resulting fall in headline inflation should continue to feed through to weaker pay and price-setting dynamics. The persistence of inflationary pressures would therefore dissipate with a less restrictive stance of monetary policy than in other cases.

31: In the second case, a period of economic slack, in which GDP fell below potential and the labour market eased further, might be required in order for pay and price-setting dynamics to normalise fully. Domestic inflationary persistence would then be expected to fade away, owing to the opening up of slack from a more restrictive stance of monetary policy relative to the first case.

32: In the third case, the economy might be subject to structural shifts such as changes in wage and price-setting following the major supply shocks that had been experienced over recent years. The degree of restrictiveness of monetary policy might be less than embodied in the Committee’s latest assessment, meaning that monetary policy would have to remain tighter for longer.

33: The Committee continued to monitor the accumulation of evidence from a broad range of indicators, with a focus on the extent to which it was possible over time to use developments in data series to assess the various cases.

34: Since the MPC’s previous meeting, global activity growth had continued at a steady pace, although some data outturns suggested greater uncertainty around the near-term outlook. Oil prices had fallen back, reflecting in large part weaker demand. Market-implied paths for policy rates across major advanced economies had declined.

35: There had generally been limited news in UK economic indicators relative to the Committee’s expectations in the August Monetary Policy Report. Headline GDP growth was expected to return to its underlying pace of around 0.3% per quarter in the second half of the year. Based on a broad set of indicators, the MPC judged that the labour market continued to loosen but that it remained tight by historical standards.

36: Twelve-month CPI inflation had been 2.2% in August, and was expected to increase to around 2½% towards the end of this year as declines in energy prices last year fell out of the annual comparison. Services consumer price inflation had remained elevated at 5.6% in August. Private sector regular average weekly earnings growth had declined to 4.9% in the three months to July. Households’ inflation expectations had largely normalised to close to their historical averages, although businesses’ inflation expectations had remained at slightly more elevated levels.

Bank Rate decision

37: Different members took different views on the probabilities and risks associated with the various cases that the Committee was considering, which were informing their votes on Bank Rate.

38: Eight members preferred to maintain Bank Rate at 5% at this meeting. Wage and price-setting had continued to normalise and UK activity growth had been broadly in line with expectations, although there was some greater uncertainty around the near-term global outlook. There was a range of views among these members on the degree to which the unwinding of past global shocks, the normalisation in inflation expectations and the current restrictive policy stance would lead underlying domestic inflationary pressures to continue to unwind, or whether these pressures could prove more entrenched, possibly as a result of more structural factors or greater momentum in demand. Despite these differences of view, the current policy stance was judged to be appropriate. For most members, in the absence of material developments, a gradual approach to removing policy restraint would be warranted.

39: One member preferred a 0.25 percentage point reduction in Bank Rate at this meeting. Bank Rate needed to become less restrictive now to enable a smooth and gradual transition in the policy stance, and to account for lags in transmission. CPI inflation had been on a firm downward trajectory for some time. Data developments remained consistent with CPI inflation staying sustainably at target, given the further easing in the labour market, continued falls in inflation expectations and forward-looking indicators of pass-through, and the subdued outlook for demand.

40: Monetary policy would need to continue to remain restrictive for sufficiently long until the risks to inflation returning sustainably to the 2% target in the medium term had dissipated further. The Committee continued to monitor closely the risks of inflation persistence and would decide the appropriate degree of monetary policy restrictiveness at each meeting.

41: The MPC would make a full assessment of recent and prospective developments as part of its forthcoming November forecast round.

Annual decision on the pace of reduction in the stock of UK government bond purchases held for monetary policy purposes

42: As set out in the minutes of its August 2022 meeting, the MPC had committed to review the reduction in the Asset Purchase Facility (APF) annually and, as part of that, to set an amount for the reduction in the stock of purchased UK government bonds (gilts) over the subsequent 12-month period. Box A of the August 2024 Monetary Policy Report had set out an assessment of the process of quantitative tightening over the previous year.

43: The Committee continued to judge that reducing the size of the APF had the benefit of reducing the risk of a ratchet upwards in the size of the Bank’s balance sheet over time, and thus should increase the headroom and flexibility available to the Bank to use its balance sheet in the future if needed.

44: The appropriate pace of gilt stock reduction would continue to be guided by a set of key principles, which the MPC had first outlined in the August 2021 Monetary Policy Report. First, the Committee intended to use Bank Rate as its active policy tool when adjusting the stance of monetary policy. Second, sales would be conducted so as not to disrupt the functioning of financial markets. Third, to help achieve that, sales would be conducted in a gradual and predictable manner over a period of time.

45: As set out in the Box in the August 2024 Report, the Committee judged that quantitative tightening had continued to proceed smoothly. There was no evidence of a negative impact of gilt sales on market functioning across a range of financial market measures. In particular, measures of gilt market liquidity had further improved. APF reduction was likely to have had some tightening effect on yields, which, while difficult to measure precisely, was judged to have been modest. That was in line with the MPC’s previous expectations, and was broadly consistent with findings from other empirical studies and central banks. The Committee would continue to learn from monitoring developments as the process progressed.

46: While it remained hard to measure precisely the marginal effect of quantitative tightening on the economy, the MPC’s forecasts were conditioned on asset prices that incorporated announced and expected APF reductions. The MPC had therefore taken this effect into account when setting the desired monetary policy stance using Bank Rate. Any tightening effect from the reduction in the APF would have led to a slightly lower path for Bank Rate, all else equal. Given that the impact of APF reduction was judged to have been modest, this was unlikely to have made a material difference to the appropriate path for Bank Rate over the past year.

47: The Committee considered the case to maintain the pace of gilt stock reduction at £100 billion over the 12 months ahead, of which £87 billion would be maturing APF gilt holdings. Bank staff had briefed the MPC on the current state of economic and market conditions. The Financial Policy Committee (FPC) had also been briefed on the MPC’s deliberations.

48: All members of the MPC agreed at this meeting that the Bank of England should reduce the stock of UK government bond purchases held for monetary policy purposes, and financed by the issuance of central bank reserves, by £100 billion over the 12-month period from October 2024 to September 2025, comprising both maturing gilts and sales.

49: The MPC also reaffirmed that there would be a high bar for amending the planned reduction in the stock of purchased gilts outside a scheduled annual review. That was in order to remain consistent with the principles that Bank Rate should be the active policy tool when adjusting the stance of monetary policy, and that APF reduction should be predictable. In judging whether that bar was met, the FPC would also have a role through its assessment of financial stability.

50: The Chair invited the Committee to vote on the propositions that:

• Bank Rate should be maintained at 5%; and
• The Bank of England should reduce the stock of UK government bond purchases held for monetary policy purposes, and financed by the issuance of central bank reserves, by £100 billion over the next 12 months, to a total of £558 billion.

51: Eight members (Andrew Bailey, Sarah Breeden, Megan Greene, Clare Lombardelli, Catherine L Mann, Huw Pill, Dave Ramsden and Alan Taylor) voted in favour of the first proposition. Swati Dhingra voted against this proposition, preferring to reduce Bank Rate by 0.25 percentage points, to 4.75%.

52: The Committee voted unanimously in favour of the second proposition.

Operational considerations

53: On 18 September 2024, the stock of UK government bonds held for monetary policy purposes was £659 billion.

54: At this meeting, the MPC had voted to reduce the stock of UK government bond purchases held for monetary policy purposes by £100 billion over the 12-month period from October 2024 to September 2025. The details of the first quarter of the associated gilt sales programme, covering 2024 Q4, were set out in a Market Notice accompanying these minutes. The Bank would continue to set auction sizes each quarter, to meet the MPC’s annual target as closely as practicable.

55: The following members of the Committee were present:

Andrew Bailey, Chair

Sarah Breeden

Swati Dhingra

Megan Greene

Clare Lombardelli

Catherine L Mann

Huw Pill

Dave Ramsden

Alan Taylor

Sam Beckett was present as the Treasury representative.

David Roberts was present on 12 September, and Jonathan Bewes on 16 September, as observers for the purpose of exercising oversight functions in their roles as members of the Bank’s Court of Directors.

Wide post-Fed swings signal that the dollar is still looking for direction, as long-tailed Wednesday’s candle and long upper shadow forming today, support scenario of extended directionless mode.

Short-lived spike below psychological 100 support (hit 14-month low in immediate reaction to Fed’s decision) was followed by rise to one-week high, which failed to sustain gains, keeping the price within a range.

Confronting signals from a jumbo rate cut and renewed narrative of soft landing, due to still resilient economy, keep the dollar on hold for now.

On the other hand, daily studies remain in full bearish setup and contribute to signals of continuation of larger downtrend, after recent correction (100.38/101.79) was completed.

However, bears need to register a weekly close below 200WMA (100.33) and clear break below 100 level, to open way for extension of the bear-leg from 105.78 (Jun 28 high), towards a higher base at 99.20 zone (July 2023) and Fibo support at 98.92 61.8% of 89.15/114.72 uptrend).

Near-term action is expected to remain biased lower while holding below converged descending 10/20DMA’s (100.91/101.01).

Res: 100.91; 101.01; 101.37; 101.79.
Sup: 100.00; 99.86; 99.20; 98.92.

.

Market Picture

The crypto market rallied solidly by 3% to $2.15 trillion, gaining further momentum after the Fed’s decisive rate cut. Increased risk appetite in the markets after the Fed’s decision helped cryptocurrencies hit highs over the past three weeks. The crypto market has been moving within a downward corridor since mid-March, and only a surpassing of the recent $2.25 trillion peaks could change this trend.

Bitcoin has reached the $62K level. That’s an impressive 19% gain since the lows in early September, but only +7% in 7 days and less than +2% in 30 days. The downtrend has been in place since March, and the previous peak of around $64K roughly coincides with the 200-day moving average. We assume that Bitcoin may encounter serious resistance at this level, overcoming which would clear the way up.

Ethereum has shown a promising rebound from its 200-week average, ending the week in positive territory. From current levels above $2400, significant resistance is unlikely to be encountered until the $2800 area, near the 50-week average.

News background

Bitcoin balances on centralised platforms have fallen by around 15% since the start of the year to 470,000 BTC, CryptoQuant noted. That’s the lowest since 2016, potentially easing selling pressure.

The Bitcoin market has seen a general decline in demand and activity from investors. At the same time, the prevailing sentiment is to hold coins. This “equilibrium” position has coincided with an increase in the capitalisation of stablecoins, which creates a compressed spring effect for the bitcoin price, Glassnode notes.

The Republican congressmen said in a letter to agency head Gary Gensler that the SEC should clearly define airdrops. The SEC has previously said that airdrops could be considered a “sale or distribution of securities.”

Cryptocurrency exchange Bitget and fund Foresight Ventures announced a $30 million acquisition of Toncoin (TON) coin from large holders. The investment will be used to develop the TON blockchain and other Telegram-based projects, including clicker games such as Notcoin and Hamster Kombat.

Brent crude oil has regained its upward momentum, climbing towards 73.63 USD, following a recent decline triggered by comments from US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. In his statement, Powell indicated that the Fed would be cautious about further easing monetary conditions, emphasizing that the rate cut schedule should not be seen as a definitive plan for all future actions by the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC).

Despite these cautious remarks, the Fed's recent decision to lower rates by 50 basis points is fundamentally seen as positive for the commodity market. Lower borrowing costs might stimulate economic demand and enhance interest in energy resources.

Concurrently, the latest data from the US Department of Energy showing a decrease in crude oil inventories by 1.63 million barrels—exceeding expectations of a 0.50 million barrel reduction—also supports bullish sentiments in the oil market. This stock reduction is especially significant as it indicates a robust demand backdrop.

Additionally, the market is closely monitoring potential increases in oil production by OPEC+ countries and the economic data coming from China, the world’s largest oil consumer. Recent weaker-than-expected economic indicators from China have cast some doubts on the sustained strength of oil demand.

The geopolitical situation in the Middle East remains a critical factor, with any escalation potentially impacting energy supply routes and market stability.

Technical analysis of Brent Crude Oil

The market has established a consolidation range around 72.00 USD, with current fluctuations extending to a high of 73.73 USD and a low of 71.78 USD. Having found support at 71.78 USD, there is potential for the market to breach the upper boundary of 73.73 USD today. A successful break above this level could indicate a continuation of the growth trend towards 75.15 USD, possibly reaching up to 75.77 USD. The MACD indicator supports this bullish outlook, with the signal line below zero but pointing upwards, suggesting an imminent upward movement.

Today, Brent surpassed the 73.00 USD mark, continuing its ascent towards the target of 75.15 USD. Upon reaching this target, a retest of the 73.00 USD level from above may occur, potentially setting the stage for another upward wave towards 75.77 USD. The Stochastic oscillator, currently above 80, is poised for a temporary decline, indicating that a corrective phase could follow before further gains.

• The crypto market has responded favorably to the Fed rate cut
• Ethereum is in the green but a bearish trend is still in place
• Momentum indicators are turning bullish

Ethereum is experiencing a green session today, recovering from Monday’s correction and preparing to test the recent $2,464 high. The crypto world appears to be benefiting from Wednesday’s aggressive Fed rate cut, contrary to the US stock indices being under pressure. However, the bearish trend that started in late May remains firmly in place and is characterized by a series of lower highs and lower lows.

In the meantime, the momentum indicators are trying to send bullish signals. The RSI is edging higher, but it has not managed yet to move above its midpoint. Interestingly, the stochastic oscillator is moving aggressively higher, towards its overbought area and it is building a sizeable gap from its moving average. Should this move pick up pace, it would be seen as a strong bullish signal.

Should the bulls remain confident, they would try to lead Ethereum above the busy 2,513-2,543 area, which is populated by the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level of the October 13, 2023 – March 12, 2024 uptrend and the 50-day simple moving average (SMA). Even higher, the 2,667 level might prove a smaller obstacle for the bulls than currently anticipated with their focus then potentially turning to the 50% Fibonacci retracement at 2,816, in an attempt to break the recent sequence of lower highs.

On the other hand, the bears are trying to retake market control and keep ethereum below the 2,513 level. They could then gradually push it lower towards the 8-month low at 2,159. Even lower, the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement at 2,081 could really test the bears’ determination to achieve a new 2024 low.

To conclude, ethereum is benefiting from the stronger Fed rate cut but some key resistance areas have to be broken for the current bearish trend to be reversed.

The Federal Reserve surprised the market yesterday by cutting the dollar rate by 0.5%, with expectations that a similar reduction might occur by the end of the year. The dollar initially dropped sharply following the announcement but then partially recovered after comments from Jerome Powell. The Fed Chair stated that the current decision would not dictate the pace for further rate cuts and should help maintain stability in the labour market under current conditions.

Major currency pairs reacted strongly to the Fed's decision. The GBP/USD pair hit a new high for the year, dropping to 1.3100, while USD/JPY fell to 140.50 before strengthening by more than 200 pips. The USD/CAD pair managed to rise above 1.3600.

USD/JPY

The USD/JPY pair is under dual pressure. On one side, the US regulator is aggressively cutting rates, while the Bank of Japan plans to raise rates after a long period of ultra-low rates. In such conditions, the pair experiences high volatility, with a daily range of 200 pips.

According to technical analysis, the pair is undergoing a corrective pullback after forming a "hammer" pattern on the daily timeframe. Currently, the rise is constrained by a significant resistance level at 144.00. The price has been testing this level for about two weeks, and if buyers fail to hold above it in the upcoming trading sessions, a return to 141.00-140.00 is possible.

Factors influencing USD/JPY include:

• Today at 09:00 (GMT +3:00), the release of the Philadelphia Fed manufacturing index (US).
• Today at 09:00 (GMT +3:00), the release of initial jobless claims in the US.
• Tomorrow at 05:30 (GMT +3:00), the Bank of Japan’s monetary policy report.

USD/CAD

Yesterday, the USD/CAD pair managed to break above 1.3600 and tested the key level of 1.3650. If buyers can maintain the 1.3600-1.3580 range as support, the corrective rise may continue towards 1.3800-1.3700. If the minimum of 1.3440 from yesterday is revisited, the downtrend may resume with renewed strength.

Trade over 50 forex markets 24 hours a day with FXOpen. Take advantage of low commissions, deep liquidity, and spreads from 0.0 pips. Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading forex with FXOpen.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.

• GBPUSD prints new high near 1.3300 after FOMC rate decision
• Technical signals remain bullish but clear close above 1.3200 is needed
• BoE expected to leave rates steady at 11:00 GMT

GBPUSD remains committed to closing above the 1.3200 level for one more day. The Fed delivered a surprise double rate cut of 50bps on Wednesday, lifting the pair to a new 2 ½-year high of 1.3296. Powell expressed confidence in avoiding a downturn but gave no clear indication of the pace of the easing cycle, causing the price to drop below 1.3200 again.

The BoE’s rate decision is the next highlight on the calendar, and the pair is currently flirting with the August bar of 1.3265. With the RSI consistently rising above 50 and the MACD about to cross its red signal line in the positive region, the risk is skewed to the upside. Yet, with the stochastic oscillator preparing for a downturn, room for improvement might be limited.

Above 1.3265, the price could get congested around the resistance line from May currently seen at 1.3350. The 1.3400 psychological mark could also challenge the bulls. If not, the pair could rocket up to 1.3600 last seen in February 2022.

On the downside, there are a couple of support levels to keep in mind. The 20-day SMA at 1.3155 and the trendline zone of 1.3090-1.3110 will be closely watched if the price pulls back below 1.3200. Even lower, the spotlight might shift to the 50-day SMA and the ascending line at 1.2980. Another violation there could take a rest near 1.2900.

Overall, for GBPUSD to sustain its pattern of higher highs and higher lows, it must stay buoyant above 1.3200. 

Switzerland’s State Secretariat for Economic Affairs forecasts the economy to perform "considerably below average" in 2024, with modest growth expected to pick up in 2025. Adjusted for major sporting events, GDP growth is projected to be at 1.2% for 2024, unchanged from June's estimates. However, the outlook for 2025 has been slightly downgraded to 1.6%, compared to June forecast of 1.7%.

Inflation is now expected to decline faster than previously thought, with projections for 2024 revised down to 1.2% (from 1.4% in June) and 0.7% for 2025 (down from 1.1%). This easing of inflationary pressures reflects lower price growth, especially in sectors impacted by the strong appreciation of the Swiss Franc.

SECO acknowledged the challenges posed by sluggish economic activity in Europe, which, alongside the real appreciation of the Swiss Franc, is straining export-sensitive sectors in Switzerland this year. Looking ahead, gradual recovery in Europe is expected to support Swiss exports and boost investments in 2025, helping to stabilize growth across key sectors.

Full Swiss SECO release here.

Short term Elliott Wave view on EURJPY suggests cycle from 8.16.2024 high ended at 155.14 as wave A. Internal subdivision of wave A unfolded as 5 waves impulse. Down from 8.16.2024 high, wave ((i)) ended at 160 and wave ((ii)) rally ended at 162.89. Wave ((iii)) lower ended at 155.446 and rally in wave ((iv)) ended at 157.51. The pair then extended lower in wave ((v)) towards 155.14 which completed wave A.

Wave B rally is currently in progress to correct cycle from 8.15.2024 high. Internal subdivision of wave B is unfolding as a double three Elliott Wave structure. Up from wave A, wave (a) ended at 157.1 and pullback in wave (b) ended at 156.04. The pair then rallied higher in wave (c) towards 158.33 which completed wave ((w)). Pullback in wave ((x)) ended at 157.03 and it has since turned higher again in wave ((y)). Up from wave ((x)), wave (a) ended at 158.03 and pullback in wave (b) ended at 157.10. Wave (c) higher is now in progress towards 160.25 – 162.24 and this should also complete wave ((y)) of B in higher degree. Near term, as far as pivot at 162.91 high stays intact, expect rally to fail in 3, 7, 11 swing for further downside.

EURJPY 60 Minutes Elliott Wave Chart

EURJPY Elliott Wave Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nUdihd7Zjo